ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Since in two phase 3 clinical trials, there were a disproportion of number of thromboembolic events in the tixagevimab/cilgavimab group than in placebo group, there is a cardiovascular safety concerns with the use of this Anti-SARS-COV-2 Monoclonal Antibody. Whether tixagevimab/cilgavimab use in real life context increases the risk for of thromboembolic events is unclear. METHODS: We used VigiBase, the World Health Organization's individual case safety reports database, to assess the risk of reporting arterial or venous thromboembolic events in COVID-19 patients (≥12 years) exposed to tixagevimab/cilgavimab compared with COVID-19 patients exposed to other anti-SARS-CoV-2 mAbs, including casirivimab/imdevimab, bamlanivimab/etesevimab and sotrovimab. RESULTS: Among the 8,952 reports of patients with an anti-SARS-CoV-2 mAb, 31 reports of thromboembolic events associated with tixagevimab/cilgavimab, mainly deep vein thrombosis (10), pulmonary embolism (8) and myocardial infarction (7). Compared with other anti-SARS-CoV-2 mAbs, the use of tixagevimab/cilgavimab was associated with an increased risk of reporting arterial thromboembolic events (Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR) 3.25; 95%CI 1.73, 6.10). Concerning venous thromboembolic events, a significant increase in the risk of reporting was observed with use of tixagevimab/cilgavimab (ROR 3.59; 95%CI 2.16, 5.96). CONCLUSIONS: This observational study corroborate in a real-world setting, the cardiovascular safety signal already found with tixagevimab/cilgavimab in two clinical trials. Owing these thromboembolic safety concerns and considering the lack of clinical trials supporting a protection against the omicron variant, there is an urgent need to improve knowledge on the effectiveness of tixagevimab/cilgavimab with new COVID-19 variants.
ABSTRACT
AIMS: While some concerns about vaccination-related pericarditis and/or myocarditis have been raised, no published data are available on pericarditis and/or myocarditis with mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in the age group of adolescents, particularly 12-15 years. The objective of this study was to determine whether the risk of reporting pericarditis and/or myocarditis with mRNA COVID-19 vaccines varied according to dose of vaccination, age, sex, and type of pericarditis and/or myocarditis in adolescents between 12 and 17 years. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed an observational study reviewing all reports of adolescents vaccinated with mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and recorded in VigiBase®, the World Health Organization global database of individual case safety reports. We included all reports registered between 1 January 2021 and 14 September 2021. Reporting odds ratios (RORs) with their 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated to estimate the risk of reporting pericarditis and/or myocarditis. Among 4942 reports with mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in adolescents, we identified 242 pericarditis and/or myocarditis. Compared with the first dose of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, the second dose was associated with an increased risk of reporting pericarditis and/or myocarditis (ROR 4.95; 95% CI 3.14, 7.89). The risk of reporting pericarditis and/or myocarditis was 10 times higher in boys than in girls and no difference between the two types of vaccines could be demonstrated. CONCLUSION: This investigation including only adolescent data suggests for the first time that the second dose of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines increases the risk of reporting myocarditis/pericarditis compared with the first dose particularly in boys without significant difference between tozinameran and elasomeran.